Original Article
Volume: 41 | Issue: 1 | Published: Mar 25, 2025 | Pages: 06 - 06 | DOI: 10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials
Authors:
Hira Asghar
, Hammad Hassan
, Sana Akram
, Muhammad Asif Shahzad
, Ayma Syed
, Zenab Yasir
Article Info
Authors
Hira Asghar
Associate Professor, Science of Dental Materials, Azra Naheed Dental College, Superior University, Lahore
Hammad Hassan
Assistant Professor, Science of Dental Materials, University of Health Sciences, Lahore
Sana Akram
Assistant Professor, Azra Naheed Dental College, Superior University, Lahore
Muhammad Asif Shahzad
Professor Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Azra Naheed Dental College. Superior University, Lahore
Ayma Syed
Head of Department, Community Dentistry, Azra Naheed Dental College. Superior University, Lahore
Zenab Yasir
Associate Professor, Science of Dental Materials, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Lahore
Publication History
Received: September 07, 2024
Accepted: January 03, 2025
Published: March 25, 2025
Abstract
Background and Objective: Repairing composite restorations is a conservative alternative to replacement, and bond strength is influenced by both the composite type and surface treatment. This study compared the shear bond strength of microhybrid and bulk-fill composites repaired with bulk-fill composite using different surface treatment protocols.
Methods: This experimental study, conducted from July 2023 to February 2024, included 120 samples: 60 microhybrid composites and 60 bulk-fill composites. The samples were divided into a control group with no further treatment and an experimental group with additional surface treatments. The samples were prepared in Teflon moulds, cured, aged in deionized water, and exposed to thermal cycling as per ISO standard/TR 11405 (2003). The surface treatments included roughening, application of a universal adhesive (iBOND Universal), sandblasting with alumina, and a silane coupling agent (bis-Silane, BISCO Inc.). The repair composites were applied and cured, followed by
shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine.
Results: Specific post-hoc comparisons revealed that control groups generally exhibited the lowest bond strengths, with varying mean values: 11.98 ± 3.83 MPa, 23.01 ± 7.46 MPa, and 12.90 ± 3.03 MPa for different controls. Conversely, specimens treated with bulk-fill material consistently showed higher shear bond strength, especially those undergoing sandblasting, which recorded the highest bond strengths among all the groups tested (p < 0.01). Additionally, the failure analysis under a stereo light microscope revealed a transition in rupture types from “adhesive interface” to “cohesive in composite” in aged specimens, after thermal cycling, indicating a reduction in the cohesive strength over time.
Conclusion: Sandblasting notably improved the repair effectiveness, emphasizing the importance of surface preparation in dental composite repairs. These findings underscore the need for careful selection of surface treatment techniques to optimize repair outcomes in dental restorations.
Keywords: Composite Resins, Dental Materials, Dental Restoration Failure, Shear Strength
Pubmed Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. BioMedica. 2025; 25 (March 2025): 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
Web Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. https://biomedicapk.com/index.php/articles/1196 [Access: August 10, 2025]. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
AMA (American Medical Association) Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. BioMedica. 2025; 25 (March 2025): 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
Vancouver/ICMJE Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. BioMedica. (2025), [cited August 10, 2025]; 25 (March 2025): 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
Harvard Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir (2025) Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. BioMedica, 25 (March 2025): 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
Chicago Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. "Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials." 25 (2025), 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir. "Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials." 25.March 2025 (2025), 06-06. Print. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196
APA (American Psychological Association) Style
Hira Asghar, Hammad Hassan, Sana Akram, Muhammad Asif Shahzad, Ayma Syed, Zenab Yasir (2025) Comparative analysis of various surface treatment techniques on the shear bond strength of repaired dental composite materials. , 25 (March 2025), 06-06. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1196