Original Article
VOLUME: 40 | ISSUE: 1 | Mar 15, 2024 | PAGE: (50 - 54) | DOI: 10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice
Authors: Aqsa Waheed , Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar , Nosheen Sarwar , Sheejia Asif , Minhal , Mor Khan Shar
Article Info
Authors
Aqsa Waheed
Postgraduate Trainee, FCPS, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad
Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar
Associate Prof, Head of Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamaba
Nosheen Sarwar
Postgraduate Trainee, FCPS, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad
Sheejia Asif
Postgraduate Trainee, FCPS, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad
Minhal
Undergraduate BDS Student, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi
Mor Khan Shar
Postgraduate Trainee, FCPS, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad
Publication History
Received: December 22, 2023
Revised: February 12, 2024
Accepted: March 05, 2024
Published: March 15, 2024
Abstract
Background and Objective: The rubber dam is the only method that can ensure complete isolation during dental procedures. During endodontic and restorative procedures, it improves patient protection, treatment efficacy, and infection control. A novel rubber dam system called Optradam has introduced a remarkably comfortable, user-friendly clamp-free technique. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare conventional rubber and OptraDam®Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent) based on patients’ and dentist preferences.
Methods: After receiving ethics board clearance, this trial was carried out at the Department of Operative Dentistry at a tertiary care hospital in Islamabad from June to December 2022. A total of 30 participants were assigned to each group; conventional rubber dam
(Group-1) and OptraDam®Plus (Group-2). Two questionnaires were designed and validated one to be completed by dental practitioners and the other by patients. The gathered information was analyzed using statistical tests of significance.
Results: A total of 60 patients were treated; 31 (52%) males and 29 (28%) females with a mean age of 32.35 years (SD = 4.59). Both the dentists (80% ) and the patients (73.3%) favored the conventional rubber dam system (Group-1). Concerning patient comfort, the conventional rubber dam (96.7%) was considered more comfortable than the OptraDam®Plus (Group-2) (86.7%). More effective moisture management was seen in Group-1 patients (90%). Other factors, such as time, convenience of application, and imaging radiography, had statistically insignificant results among both groups.
Conclusion: The results indicate that both patients as well as operators, preferred the use of conventional rubber dams over OptraDam®Plus during an endodontic and restorative procedure..
Keywords: Conventional rubber dam, OptraDam®Plus, preference, endodontics, restorative dentistry.
Pubmed Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. BioMedica. 2024; 15 (March 2024): 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
Web Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. https://biomedicapk.com/articles/online_first/1052 [Access: April 29, 2024]. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
AMA (American Medical Association) Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. BioMedica. 2024; 15 (March 2024): 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
Vancouver/ICMJE Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. BioMedica. (2024), [cited April 29, 2024]; 15 (March 2024): 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
Harvard Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar (2024) In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. BioMedica, 15 (March 2024): 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
Chicago Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. "In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice." 15 (2024), 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar. "In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice." 15.March 2024 (2024), 50-54. Print. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052
APA (American Psychological Association) Style
Aqsa Waheed, Sheharyar Akhtar Khokhar, Nosheen Sarwar, Sheejia Asif, Minhal, Mor Khan Shar (2024) In vivo comparative study of two different rubber dam systems in dental practice. , 15 (March 2024), 50-54. doi:10.24911/BioMedica/5-1052