Original Article
Volume: 37 | Issue: 4 | Published: Dec 25, 2021 | Pages: 270 - 275 | DOI: 10.51441/BioMedica/5-271
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine for pain management in patients with cesarean section
Authors: Liang Zhang
Article Info
Authors
Publication History
Received: June 21, 2021
Revised: August 11, 2021
Accepted: December 10, 2021
Published: December 25, 2021
Abstract
Background and Objective: Intraspinal morphine shows a high analgesic efficacy but may cause some adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine
(Dex) improves anesthetic actions and reduces anesthesia-related adverse reactions. This study was aimed to observe the efficacy and
safety of intravenous Dex combined with epidural morphine for pain management in patients after cesarean sections.
Methods: Eighty women undergoing cesarean sections were equally divided into two groups. Group A received Dex in combination with
morphine and group B received morphine only. Participants in both groups were given morphine after cesarean sections. After delivery,
women in the group A were given Dex, while participants in the group B were given physiological saline. Serum levels of cortisol, renin,
and potassium were measured before anesthesia, immediately and 24 hours after cesarean sections, and the visual analog scale (VAS)
and observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) scores were assessed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after cesarean sections. In
addition, post-operative adverse events and urine volume intraoperative and at 24-hour after cesarean section was measured.
Results: Lower serum levels of cortisol and renin were recorded in group A than group B immediately after cesarean sections (p < 0.05).
VAS score was low in group A than group B at 12 and 24 hours after cesarean sections (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were
seen in the OAA/S score (p > 0.05). Lower frequency of shivering and nausea/vomiting was seen in group A than group B after cesarean
sections, and increased urine volume intraoperatively and after 24 hours of cesarean sections was observed in group A than group B (p <
0.05).
Conclusion: Dex-morphine combination achieves a higher efficacy and lesser adverse events than morphine alone for post-cesarean
analgesia.
Keywords: Cesarean section, analgesia, dexmedetomidine, morphine, efficacy, safety.
Biomedica - Official Journal of University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
Volume 37(4):270-275
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in combination with morphine for pain management in patients with cesarean section
Liang Zhang1
Received: 21 July 2021 Revised date: 21 November 2021 Accepted: 10 December 2021
Correspondence to: Liang Zhang
*Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangyin People’s Hospital, Jiangyin City, China.
Email: jiangyinzl@aliyun.com
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective:
Intraspinal morphine shows a high analgesic efficacy but may cause some adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) improves anesthetic actions and reduces anesthesia-related adverse reactions. This study was aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of intravenous Dex combined with epidural morphine for pain management in patients after cesarean sections.
Methods:
Eighty women undergoing cesarean sections were equally divided into two groups. Group A received Dex in combination with morphine and group B received morphine only. Participants in both groups were given morphine after cesarean sections. After delivery, women in the group A were given Dex, while participants in the group B were given physiological saline. Serum levels of cortisol, renin, and potassium were measured before anesthesia, immediately and 24 hours after cesarean sections, and the visual analog scale (VAS) and observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) scores were assessed at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after cesarean sections. In addition, post-operative adverse events and urine volume intraoperative and at 24-hour after cesarean section was measured.
Results:
Lower serum levels of cortisol and renin were recorded in group A than group B immediately after cesarean sections (p < 0.05). VAS score was low in group A than group B at 12 and 24 hours after cesarean sections (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were seen in the OAA/S score (p > 0.05). Lower frequency of shivering and nausea/vomiting was seen in group A than group B after cesarean sections, and increased urine volume intraoperatively and after 24 hours of cesarean sections was observed in group A than group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Dex-morphine combination achieves a higher efficacy and lesser adverse events than morphine alone for post-cesarean analgesia.
Keywords:
Cesarean section, analgesia, dexmedetomidine, morphine, efficacy, safety.
Introduction
Epidural analgesia is a common choice for the pain management after caesarian section.1 The incidence of insufficient analgesia after cesarean accounts for 50% even after multiple measures used to manage pain.2,3 Effective pain management following cesarean section is required to control chronic pain and increased postpartum depression.4,5 Intraspinal administration of morphine helps in achieving efficient and long duration of analgesia; however, this technique is associated with high incidence of adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.6
Dexmedetomidine (Dex), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, shows sedative, analgesic, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and opioid-sparing actions properties. It plays a vital role in the improvement of anesthetic effect and prevention and alleviation of anesthesia-related adverse reactions.7-9 Postoperative intravenous opioid-DEX combined with other pain controlling approaches lead to superior analgesia, opioid sparing, less side effects of opioids, fewer chills, and better patient satisfaction.10 This research was conducted to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of intravenous Dex combined with epidural morphine for pain management in women undergoing cesarean sections.
Methods
This single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangyin People’s Hospital, China from April 2017 to October 2017 after getting approval by the hospital Ethical Review Committee. A total of n = 80 singleton term pregnant women (aged; 20 to 40 years), undergoing selective cesarean sections were equally divided into two groups randomly: group A, who received Dex-morphine combination and group B, who received morphine only. All participants were selected according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System.11 Women with subarachnoid anesthesia, additional administration of local anesthetics through the epidural catheter, massive intraoperative hemorrhage and any other co-morbid conditions were excluded. Signed informed consent was taken from all the participants, following a detailed description of the potential risk and response management of the anesthesia. All procedures were performed by the well-trained and licensed anesthetists in accordance with the international and national guidelines.
All participants were fasted for 6 hours prior to cesarean sections. Peripheral venous access was established after transferring the women to operating room. Heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were measured with an electrocardiogram monitor. Subarachnoid-epidural anesthesia was induced at the Lumbar (L2-L3) interspace in a left lateral decubitus position by subarachnoid administration with 1.8 ml 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride (batch no.: 74170402; Shanghai Harvest Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Shanghai, China) followed by epidural catheterization 3 cm to a cephalad direction. The lying-in women were placed in a supine position, and the surgical table was turned to 15° of left lateral tilt. After the sensory block plane reached the Thoracic (T5-T6) level, cesarean section was performed via a transverse incision in the lower uterine segment, with intraoperative fluid administration of 500 ml of Lactated Ringer’s Injection (batch no.: E17021503-2; Hunan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Yueyang, China) and Hetastarch injection (batch no.: 1703254; Nanjing Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Nanjing, China). All anesthesia procedures were induced by the same anesthetist.
After delivery, continuous intravenous infusion of Dex (batch no.: 170831BP; Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd.; Lianyugang, China) was given to the group A at a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg and at a background infusion rate of 0.1 μg/(kg/hour) for 15 minutes, and the same volume of physiological saline was given in the group B by intravenous infusion for 15 minutes. Following cesarean sections, epidural administration of 2.5 mg morphine (batch no.: 161113-2 Northeast Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.; Shenyang, China) was given to the participants in both groups, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the form of bolus dose (100 ml), continuous basal infusion (2 ml/hour), demand doses (1 ml), lockout interval, (30 minutes) was given followed by maintenance till 48 hours post-operation. Additional intravenous administration of tramadol (Batch no.: 00939F; Grünenthal GmbH; Aachen, Germany) at a dose of 2 ml/kg was given in case of incomplete analgesia. After 24 hours of cesarean sections, 400 mg tramadol was given to the participants in both groups for improving analgesia via disposable PCA pumps (Shanghai Bochuang Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.; Shanghai, China).
Serum levels of cortisol, renin, and potassium were measured immediately and 24 hours after cesarean sections. Pain was assessed by using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) scoring system at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after cesarean sections, where 0 represented no pain, and 10 indicated the worst imaginable pain.12 The level of alertness in sedated women was tested at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after cesarean sections using a 5-point observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale (OAA/S) scoring system, where 1: deep sleep/unconsciousness and no responses to mild prodding or shaking, 2: deep sedation but responses to mild prodding or shaking, 3: moderate sedation and responses to name spoken loudly or repeatedly, 4: mild sedation and lethargic responses to name spoken in a normal tone, and 5: completely awake and responses readily to name spoken in a normal tone.13 Post-operative adverse events, including shivering, bradycardia (HR < 55 beats/minute), nausea, vomiting, pruritus, intraoperative, and 24-hour urine volume after cesarean sections were also recorded.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc.; Chicago, IL). All quantitative variables were measured as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and all categorical data were described as proportions. Student t test was used to compare the difference between the two groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences of proportions. A p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
The age, height, body weight, intraoperative blood loss, and zduration of cesarean sections were comparable between the group A and group B (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
A lower VAS score was measured in group A than group B at 12 (p = 0.037) and 24 hours after cesarean sections (p = 0.036). OAA/S score was 3 in only 2 participants in group A at 4 hours after cesarean sections, 4 and greater scores were measured in other women at other time points; however, no significant differences were seen (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Before induction of anesthesia, there were no significant differences between group A and group B in terms of serum cortisol or renin levels (p > 0.05); however, lower serum levels of cortisol (p = 0.041) and renin (p = 0.037) were measured in group A after the completion of cesarean sections. We found no significant differences in the serum potassium level between the two groups before induction of anesthesia, immediately or 24 hours after cesarean sections (p > 0.05). Serum potassium level was lower than the normal range in three women 24 hours after cesarean sections, including two cases in the group A (3.3 and 3.4 mM) and one case in the group B (3.3 mM), and the serum potassium concentrations were significantly lower in both groups 24 hours after cesarean sections than before induction of anesthesia (p= 0.026) (Table 3).
Table 1. Comparison of demographic and operative characteristics between groups (mean ± SD).
Group | Age (years) | Height (cm) | Body weight (kg) | Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | Duration of cesarean section (minutes) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dex-morphine combination group (A) | 31 ± 4 | 160 ± 5 | 70 ± 7 | 283 ± 5 | 58 ± 5 |
Morphine group (B) | 32 ± 5 | 160 ± 4 | 72 ± 11 | 278 ± 7 | 59 ± 6 |
Table 2. Comparison of VAS and OAA/S scores between groups (mean ± SD).
Group | Mean VAS score at different time points after cesarean section | Mean OAA/S score at different time points after cesarean section | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours | 4 hours | 8 hours | 12 hours | 24 hours | |
Dex-morphine combination group (A) | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.7* | 2.1 ± 0.6* | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 |
Morphine group (B) | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 |
* p < 0.05 versus the morphine group (B).
During the analgesic treatment after cesarean sections, only one participant was presented with nausea/vomiting and four with pruritus in group A, while shivering (15%), nausea/vomiting (17.5%) and pruritus (17.5%) were seen more in group B. A lower incidence of shivering (0% vs. 15%, p = 0.027) and nausea/vomiting (2.5% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.021) was seen in group A than group B after cesarean sections. The intraoperative urine volume (205 ± 48 vs. 175 ± 44 ml, p = 0.021) and within 24 hours after cesarean sections (3,284 ± 730 vs. 2,644 ± 644 ml, p = 0.019) was high in group A than group B.
Discussion
Single epidural morphine administration is common and widely used for postoperative analgesia.14-17Epidural administration of sufentanil-morphine combinations improves the mother’s ability to mobilize and interact with her newborn infant.18 Epidural administration of morphine at a single dose of 3 mg /24 hours causes no respiratory depression and potential for catheter-related complications in patients undergoing cesarean sections.19 Though, increased doses of morphine extend the duration and efficacy of post-cesarean analgesia but it may cause a rise in the post-cesarean side-effects, including nausea, vomiting and pruritus.20 In the present study, tramadol at a dose of 2 ml/ kg was given for improving analgesia in case of incomplete pain relief. Another study reported satisfactory post-cesarean analgesic efficacy by intravenous administration of tramadol at a continuous infusion dose of 10 g/L and an infusion rate of 2 ml/hour.21 Since the analgesic efficacy attenuates remarkably 24 hours following single epidural administration of morphine, 400 mg tramadol was given by intravenous pumping 24 hours after cesarean sections. As an adjuvant for general and intraspinal anesthesia, the efficacy and safety of Dex have been extensively investigated in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia.7-10 Extremely low Dex level is detected in breast milk, and its administration does not affect the time of colostrum development.22 It has been shown that Dex may be used as an adjuvant for intravenous PCA and it does not increase the frequency of opioid-related respiratory depression, and also shows no marked impact on the spontaneous contraction of uterine smooth muscles. 23,24 Loading dose of Dex (0.5 μg/kg) followed by a continuous infusion rate of 0.4 μg/(kg/hour) is considered feasible and relatively safe.25
As an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, Dex acts on the posterior horn of the spinal cord to exhibit an anti-nociceptor effect to reduce the responses to traumatic stimuli, and functions on peripheral and central nerves to exhibit an anti-sympathetic action.8,9 Dex improves the analgesic efficacy of opioids and reduces the dose of opioids among patients undergoing hysterectomy.26 In patients undergoing cesarean sections, combined administration of Dex, ropivacaine and sufentanil lowers the post-cesarean cortisol levels and achieves more satisfactory analgesic efficacy than those without Dex administration.27 A lower VAS score found in group A than group B at 12 and 24 hours after cesarean sections (p < 0.05), suggests a synergistic effect caused by Dex administration in combination with epidural morphine increasing the analgesic efficacy of morphine.
Table 3. Comparison of serum cortisol, renin and potassium concentrations between groups (mean ± SD).
Group | Mean serum potassium level (mM) | Mean serum renin concentration (ng/l) | Mean serum cortisol concentration (mg/l) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before anesthesia | Immediately post-surgery | 24 hours post-surgery | Before anesthesia | Immediately post-surgery | 24 hours post-surgery | Before anesthesia | Immediately post-surgery | 24 hours post-surgery | |
Dex-morphine combination group (A) | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.08* | 0.20 ± 0.07* | 33 ± 13 | 30 ± 11* | 27 ± 12 | 3.92 ± 0.21 | 4.03 ± 0.22 | 3.73 ± 0.23** |
Morphine group (B) | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 31 ± 14 | 36 ± 13 | 29 ± 13 | 3.91 ± 0.34 | 3.92 ± 0.24 | 3.71 ± 0.21** |
* p < 0.05 versus the morphine group (B); ** p < 0.05 versus the level before anesthesia.
Surgical trauma may lead to activation of stress responses, and cortisol is a sensitive parameter for stress responses.28,29 Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is an important mechanism in stress responses.30 Opioid peptides are remarkably affecting the release of hypothalamic regulatory peptides, and morphine is reported to reduce stress responses through inhibiting the release of hormone by the adrenocorticotropic hormone. 31,32 Dex exhibits a sedative action by targeting the locus coeruleus in the central nervous system, thereby alleviating anxiety and tension, and also suppresses the release of injury-sensory neurotransmitters and the conduction of nerve fiber impulses, thereby reducing stress responses.7 This may be a possible explanation for the low serum levels of cortisol and renin following Dex administration observed in the present study.
Shivering and nausea/vomiting are common intraoperative complications.33 In pregnant women undergoing cesarean sections, shivering is more likely to occur due to an elevated basal metabolic rate at the late-stage of pregnancy, increased blood circulation, vascular dilation caused by oxytocin administration after delivery and loss of plenty of amnionic fluids.34 In the current study, a significantly lower incidence of shivering was observed in group A than group B (p < 0.05), which may be associated with the suppressing effect of Dex on the thermoregulatory center to reduce the shivering threshold and the blockade of thermal conduction via spinal cord.35 During the cesarean section, intravenous pumping of Dex at a loading dose after cutting the umbilical cord was reported to reduce the incidence of nausea/vomiting within 24 hours after the cesarean section, which is almost in agreement with the findings of the present study.36
Dex has a dose-dependent diuretic activity but does not affect serum potassium concentrations in patients receiving general anesthesia, which may be associated with the inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system on kidney, alleviation of vasopressin in renal tubules, and elevated secretion of natriuretic peptides.37 In the current study, increased urine volume in group A in both intraoperative and within 24 hours after cesarean sections was reported (p < 0.05), suggesting the intraoperative and postoperative diuretic actions of Dex in patients undergoing intraspinal anesthesia. Patients receiving cesarean sections are likely to develop hypopotassemia because of preoperative fasting, postoperative potassium-free fluids infusion and postpartum sweating due to pain and tension. The current study did not show any significant differences in serum levels of potassium between group A and group B before induction of anesthesia, immediately or 24 hours after cesarean sections (p > 0.05), indicating that administration of Dex during and after cesarean sections may increase the urine volume but not affect serum potassium levels remarkably.
Conclusion
Intravenous administration of Dex combined with morphine for post-cesarean analgesia is efficacious in alleviating stress responses in women and leads to minimal analgesia-related adverse events thus achieving better quality of life for both newborn and the mothers in the post-natal period.
Limitations of the study
The current study has some limitations. First, this was a single-center randomized, controlled clinical trial. Further multi-center trials recruiting more participants to validate the findings from this study need to be conducted. Second, present study could not differentiate that lower cortisol and renin serum levels seen in group A after cesarean sections were either because of Dex alone or Dexmorphine combination. Further studies to unravel the mechanism underlying reduced cortisol and renin following Dex administration are required.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Prof. Junli Cao from Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital China for his kind assistance during the design and implementation of the study. The author would like to thank all participants of this study.
List of Abbreviations
Dex | Dexmedetomidine |
HR | Heart rate |
OAA/S | Observer assessment of alertness/sedation scale |
PCA | Patient-controlled analgesia |
SD | Standard deviation |
VAS | Visual analog scale |
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
Grant support and financial disclosure
None to disclose.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Jiangyin People’s Hospital, China vide Approval No. 2017-022 dated 01-03-2017. This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-17010423).
Author’s contribution
The author takes full responsibility of conception, design, drafting and approval of the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Author details
Liang Zhang1
Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangyin People’s Hospital, Jiangyin City, China
References
- Verstraete S, Van de Velde M. Post-cesarean section analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(4):147–67. PMID: 23610853.
- Carvalho B, Butwick AJ. Post cesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003
- Patel R, Carvalho JC, Downey K, Kanczuk M, Bernstein P, Siddiqui N. Intraperitoneal instillation of lidocaine improves postoperative analgesia at cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(3):554–9. https://doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001799
- Jin J, Peng L, Chen Q, Zhang D, Ren L, Qin P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic pain following cesarean section: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0270-6
- Shen D, Hasegawa-Moriyama M, Ishida K, Fuseya S, Tanaka S, Kawamata M. Acute postoperative pain is correlated with the early onset of postpartum depression after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2020;34(4):607–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02789-5.5
- Bennett G, Deer T, Du Pen S, Rauck R, Yaksh T, Hassenbusch SJ. Future directions in the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20(2):S44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00201-3
- Reel B, Maani CV. Dexmedetomidine. Treasure Island, FL: Stat Pearls Publishing; 2021.
- Lee S. Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(4):323–30. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19259
- Naaz S, Ozair E. Dexmedetomidine in current anesthesia practice-a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(10):GE01–4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9624.4946
- Ren CG, Chi MY, Zhang YW, Zhang Z, Qi F, Liu Z. Dexmedetomidine in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a consort-prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Medicine. 2015;94(32):e1348. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001348
- De Cassai A, Boscolo A, Tonetti T, Ban I, Ori C. Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists’ experience: a survey-based national-study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(1):53–9. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.d.18.00224
- Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013
- Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10(4):244–51. PMID: 2286697.
- Meng ZT, Cui F, Li XY, Wang DX. Epidural morphine improves postoperative analgesia in patients after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219116
- Tobias JD. A review of intrathecal and epidural analgesia after spinal surgery in children. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(4):956–65. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000107938.80562.75
- Turker G, Goren S, Bayram S, Sahin S, Korfali G. Comparison of lumbar epidural tramadol and lumbar epidural morphine for pain relief after thoracotomy: a repeated-dose study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(4):468–74. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2005.05.013
- Kerai S, Saxena KN, Taneja B. Post-caesarean analgesia: what is new? Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(3):200–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_313_16
- Vora KS, Shah VR, Patel B, Parikh GP, Butala BP. Postoperative analgesia with epidural opioids after cesarean section: comparison of sufentanil, morphine and sufentanil-morphine combination. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(4):491– 5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.101935
- Bilir A. Single dose epidural morphine instead of patient-controlled epidural analgesia in the second day of cesarean section; an easy method for the pain relief of a new mother. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(1):118–21. PMID: 23724524.
- Dualé C, Frey C, Bolandard F, Barrière A, Schoeffler P. Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(5):690–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg249
- Jiang LH, Ji MH, Wang YX. The effects of loading dose of tramadol on postoperative analgesia in cesarean section. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2012;28(3):245–6. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:LCMZ.0.2012-03-015
- Nie Y, Liu Y, Luo Q, Huang S. Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for post-caesarean section intravenous analgesia: a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(4):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000011
- Palanisamy A, Klickovich RJ, Ramsay M, Ouyang DW, Tsen LC. Intravenous dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for labor analgesia and cesarean delivery anesthesia in a parturient with a tethered spinal cord. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18(3):258– 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.10.002
- Sia AT, Kwek K, Yeo GS. The in vitro effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine on human myometrium. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.11.004
- Wu X, Han CB, Jiang XH, Ding ZN. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for preventing of shivering during caesarean section under epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesthesiol. 2014;30(12):1211–4. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:LCMZ.0.2014-12-024
- Ren C, Chi M, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Qi F, Liu Z. Dexmedetomidine in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy: a CONSORT-prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(32):e1348. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001348
- Zhao XY, Wang XJ, Liu Y, Xue RL, Dong XZ, Zhang H, et al. Different doses of dexmedetomidine in the application of epidural analgesia after caesarean section. Int J Anesth Resus. 2014;35(5):397–400. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4378.2014.05.004
- Khoo B, Boshier PR, Freethy A, Tharakan G, Saeed S, Hill N, et al. Redefining the stress cortisol response to surgery. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;87(5):451–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13439
- Prete A, Yan Q, Al-Tarrah K, Akturk HK, Prokop LJ, Alahdab F, et al. The cortisol stress response induced by surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;89(5):554–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13820
- Takimoto-Ohnishi E, Murakami K. Renin-angiotensin system research: from molecules to the whole body. J Physiol Sci. 2019;69(4):581–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-019-00679-4
- Bicknell RJ. Endogenous opioid peptides and hypothalamic neuroendocrine neurones. J Endocrinol. 1985;107(3):437–46. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1070437
- Bali A, Randhawa PK, Jaggi AS. Stress and opioids: role of opioids in modulating stress-related behavior and effect of stress on morphine conditioned place preference. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;51(4):138–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.018
- Platz J, Hyman N. Tracking intraoperative complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):519–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.001
- Yang XJ, Sun SS. Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(3):503–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4445-2
- Bajwa SJ, Gupta S, Kaur J, Singh A, Parmar S. Reduction in the incidence of shivering with perioperative dexmedetomidine: a randomized prospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(1):86–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.92452
- Yuan F, Li N, Sun S, Nie YY, Geng GQ, Huang SQ. Efficacy of different doses of dexmedetomidine for prevention of shivering after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2015;35(2):165–7. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2015.02.006
- Wang L, Sun JH, Zhang Z, Zhang JY, Ni F, Zhang L. Effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on urinary volume and electrolytes in patients with general anesthesia. J Trauma Surg. 2013;15(2):142–44. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.Yissn.1009-4237.2013.02.014